Press Releases

GUBERNATIONAL CANDIDATE JIM COBURN

Click here to listen to this radio show aired on NHPR on October 4th.

Republican State Representative Jim Coburn is challenging incumbent Democrat John Lynch for the Governor's seat in November. Coburn has been in the news a lot lately with efforts to solve the education funding crisis, including a proposed constitutional amendment to ban broad-based taxes. We'll sit down with Rep. Coburn and ask him about the issues, the campaign and how he sees the race playing out over the next few weeks until the General Election in November. Laura's guest is Jim Coburn, State Representative and the Republican candidate for the Gubernatorial race.

October 5th, 2006

BLYNCH, COBURN SPAR OVER TAXES, EDUCATION FUNDING IN 1ST DEBATE

By Anne Saunders, Associated Press Writer

MANCHESTER, N.H. --Democratic Gov. John Lynch and Republican challenger Jim Coburn attacked each other on taxes during their first debate Thursday.

Coburn said Lynch has shown a lack of leadership in education funding that makes an income or sales tax inevitable now that the courts have declared the state's latest school funding law unconstitutional.

"His inaction really calls into question where he stands on broad-based taxes," Coburn said, at a debate organized by the Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce.

Lynch responded by restating his promise to veto any income or broad-based sales tax.

"We're not going to have a sales or an income tax in New Hampshire but we're also not going to abandon our responsibility to our cities and towns, to our schools and more importantly to our children," he said.

Coburn, a state representative from Windham, said Lynch missed an opportunity to solve the school funding problem when he failed to support Coburn's effort in the Legislature to get a constitutional amendment onto November's ballot that would keep the courts out of education funding.

"We need strong leadership in the next nine months if we're going to avoid the courts telling us what a quality education is and how we're going to fund it," he said.

The courts have given the Legislature until July to define an adequate education and figure out how to pay for it.

Lynch, in turn, accused Coburn of confusing voters with his position on the gas tax.

"Frankly I can't keep up with my opponent on this one," Lynch said.

In April, Coburn suggested suspending the state's 18 cents per gallon gas tax through the summer to give drivers a break and serve as an incentive for tourists. He later said the tax might need to be raised in the future.

Coburn defended his position, saying he proposed raising the gas tax only after New Hampshire has alternative fuels, such as ethanol and biodiesel, as a tool to encourage drivers to use the new fuels.

In his closing remarks, he accused Lynch of failing to show leadership by taking the safe road politically.

"I will not be the type of governor that trades my standing in the opinion polls for taking strong stands on the issues. On that you have my word," he said.

Lynch promoted his success in increasing the penalties on child sex offenders, in keeping the Portsmouth Shipyard open, in helping elderly residents get medicine when a new Medicare prescription benefit hit snags and in getting prompt assistance to flood victims in the state.

"We've gotten results, and that's what leadership is all about," he said.

September 8th 2006  

JIM COBURN COMMENTS ON SUPREME COURT EDUCATION RULING

“As Governor, I will make it a top priority to solve the education funding crisis.  The latest Supreme Court ruling has made it clear that a constitutional amendment is an essential component of a permanent solution.  I will provide the leadership necessary to get one on the ballot and get it passed.  Our current Governor has failed to provide the leadership necessary to solve this problem as he promised during his 2004 campaign.  His lack of leadership and opposition to a constitutional amendment has ensured that we remain without a lasting solution.  Once again, unelected judges have decided they are more capable of determining our children’s future than our elected representatives.  I pledge that as Governor I will make education funding a top priority, I feel that ‘adequacy’ is too low of a standard and will strive for an excellent education for our children, a goal we cannot achieve as long as the courts retain control of this issue.

August 22nd 2006

COBURN: FAIRNESS FOR ALL, BUT LEAVE LEGISLATING TO THE LEGISLATURE

Courts Need to Get out of the Legislative Business

Gubernatorial Candidate Jim Coburn today reaffirms his commitment to election fairness but questions the court’s timing in this decision. Coburn calls for the New Hampshire Supreme Court to refer to the Constitution as it relates to separation of powers.

“I believe very strongly in a fair electoral process, which is why I was so critical of the current Governor for vetoing two bills to ensure that only legitimate voters can go to the polls on Election Day.  In this case it is clear to me that one party or group should not receive preferential ballot placement due to its control of the legislature, however the Supreme Court has created a logistical nightmare with only three weeks left until the September 12th Primary.  The courts should not be in the legislative business in the first place. Further more, it is incomprehensible why a decision could not have been rendered while the legislature was in session. The court had a year to deal with this issue. Issuing its decision in a timely matter would have afforded the New Hampshire Legislature and the Secretary of State time to create a fair solution without causing chaos in the middle of an election cycle. This is clearly an unfair and avoidable burden that it is being placed on all parties involved,” said Coburn.

“The most alarming development however is not in the decision itself, it is that this is another example of a court not content to simply interpret the law but instead putting themselves in the business of writing the law.  The Claremont decisions are another prime example of this type of judicial policymaking,” noted Coburn.

 

Return Home